Is Trex worth more than Buddha?

I must ask, is there a legitimate basis for comparing the value of Trex, a material commonly used in decking and other outdoor applications, to the Buddha, a revered figure in many Eastern religions and philosophies? The two entities seem vastly different in nature and purpose, making such a direct comparison seem somewhat misguided. Trex, as a product, has a tangible market value based on factors such as its durability, cost, and appeal to consumers. On the other hand, the Buddha represents a spiritual and philosophical concept that transcends material worth. It's not clear what criteria one would use to determine if one is "worth more" than the other, as they exist in entirely different realms of value. Perhaps you're referring to the value of Buddhist-themed artwork or memorabilia, which could potentially be compared to the monetary value of Trex products. However, even in that context, it would be difficult to make a definitive judgment without knowing the specific items and their respective markets. So, in summary, I must inquire: What exactly do you mean by "Is Trex worth more than Buddha?" and what criteria are you using to make this comparison?